01.Blogs :
AlfredTwo  
A blog about life, Microsoft, random technology and general academic stuff.

I, Robot

I went to see I, Robot last night. I am a huge Isaac Asimov fan so naturally I was worried. Asimov was a thinking person’s writer who was always more interested in exploring ideas than in writing about a lot of sex and violence. Hollywood is if course big into sex and violence in movies. So what would they do with I, Robot I wondered. Well the good news is that they did a great job with it.

I was encouraged when I heard that Will Smith was going to be in the movie. He is also an executive producer so he must have had some control over things. Will Smith in case you do not know it is a geek. By that I mean he is a fan and user of technology. So that is a point in his favor for a movie like this one. Plus he is a very good actor. I was concerned about the woman who was to play Dr. Susan Calvin. Dr. Calvin in the robot books is not a “hot chick” but a serious scientist who is more interested in robots than people. But the actor they picked did a great job I thought.

I don’t know how many of you have read I, Robot (which is actually a collection of short stories) or any of Asimov’s other robot books. If you haven’t read them go do so. [I’ll wait. J ] But seriously if you are a computer scientist or interested in robots you need to read them.

The theme of I, Robot is similar in some ways to themes in The Matrix or Terminator movies. Man against machine, humanity against inhumanity, and the question “is man creating the seeds of its own destruction in creating ‘thinking machines?’” The difference between those movies and this one is that the inventors of Asimov’s robots are smarter than the people who invented the robots in those other movies. Asimov’s robots have hard-wired into their systems the Three Laws of Robotics. Briefly:

  1. A robot may not harm a human or through inaction allow a human to come to harm.
  2. A robot must obey orders give by a human unless the order violates the first law.
  3. A robot must protect itself as long as doing so does not violate the first or second law.

Problems develop when robots start interpreting the laws in unexpected ways. In this movie it appears that a robot has been created that can, and does, choose to violate the first law. Will Smith, whose character hates robots, decides that a robot has killed a robot engineer while everyone else believes it was a suicide. It gets complicated from there.

The screenwriters seem to really have understood the Three Laws and the sort of issues Asimov wrote about. I would say that the robots in the movie are a little rougher than Asimov would have written it. And Will Smith has an easier time fighting robots than is reasonable. But those are nits. This is not quite the think piece that an Asimov book is but it is probably as much of one as the average movie goers can handle. I hope the movie is a huge success so that Hollywood will make more robot movies based on Asimov’s books.

Also posted in the Message Boards in case anyone wants to discuss the movie in more detail.

posted on Monday, July 26, 2004 7:37 PM by AlfredTwo

# @ Monday, July 26, 2004 7:46 PM

I just saw the movie Saturday and I must say it was great. I have not read the book (although I'm seriously considering finding it now) but I was afraid this would turn out a bit cheesy...but I was really happy that it was as good as it was. Surprised me actually by how the plot twists a bit and the issues that are brought up. Not quite Matrix (movie 1) style, but still some nice things to think about. Plus the special effects seemed very well done.

AdamMB

# @ Monday, July 26, 2004 9:25 PM

bwheheh been looking forward to the movie for some time now. hope they really didn't mess it up- but from your review it seems they did a great job at making it into a film. ^_^ woopeeee... but isn't those laws, from a programming perspective, a bit too fuzzy? i mean there are lots of probable interpretations for it esp when taking into account that they are guidelines for robots. ^_^

geraldson

# @ Monday, July 26, 2004 10:49 PM

The movie is inspired by the book. While there are a couple of small bits and some characters from the short stories the movie is not based on a particular story. The stories are really good.

AlfredTwo

# @ Tuesday, July 27, 2004 1:30 AM

Sunny is a unique one, isn't it? I think it'll be cool if one day the AI level can reach such a point (discarding the Frankenstein monster's possibility) :)

szesiong

# @ Tuesday, July 27, 2004 4:00 AM

Ive yet to see it though my whole family went to watch it last sunday..they say it's really good

she_lim

# @ Tuesday, July 27, 2004 4:19 AM

I might have to see I, Robot sometime then. I tend more toward cyberpunk to golden age sci-fi, so my consumption of Asimov so far is minimal. I read several novels of the foundation series (perhaps the second trilogy?), but that's about it. How about that zeroeth law, eh?

Porphyre

# @ Tuesday, July 27, 2004 5:25 AM

i'm looking forward to its screening in malaysia...it's not out yet!!arghh...

KimHoong

# @ Tuesday, July 27, 2004 10:25 AM

I read Asimov's books a very long time ago. The short stories are great as are the robot novels Caves of Steel and Naked Sun. I was a bit concerned about a film of I Robot, but it sounds like they have taken the premise and built a good film round it. Sounds like a must see to me.

RobMiles


 
03.UPDATE CALENDAR :
<July 2004>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567

05.MY LINKS :

07.Subscriptions :

Subscriptions


© Copyright 2005 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Code of Conduct | Hosted by MaximumASP for Microsoft
WHO-BAR