Being part of the curriculum committee of the university is taking a lot of my time these days. We just had a presentation of the proposed core subjects to the University President. He was quite happy with it having a balance of Social Sciences, Humanities, Science and Technology, Philosophy and Theology subjects for all students.
On to our next task - review the professional subjects for each program offered. My task is to review the BSCS, BSIT and BSIM programs.
Last month, I ran an online survey for our BSCS alumni. The questions revolve around how they found the BSCS curriculum when they were students, what they want to improve, and so on.
Here's a summary of the results:
- 30 respondents, 93% are employed fulltime in an IT firm
- The respondents were satisfied with the Computer Science program in terms of preparing them for a career and graduate school.
- The respondents felt that the Computer Science program somewhat prepared them to apply computer science principles and concepts, use research methods, develop software, use/apply the scientific approach and critical thinking skills, work in teams, interact with people from diverse backgrounds and cultural perspectives, and express themselves in writing and oral communication.
- In general, the respondents identified all the courses offered by the Computer Science program to be beneficial in terms of preparing them for a career. Among the different courses offered by AdDU, a majority identified to be very beneficial were:
- Fundamental Computer Concepts
- Object-Oriented Programming in C++
- Object-Oriented Programming in Java
- Basic Web Development
- Web Database Development
- Data Structures and Algorithms
- Computer Networks
- Organization of Databases
- Systems Analysis and Design
- Practicum
- Independent Research
- The topics that they wish AdDU offered as electives:
- Multimedia Courses
- Animation and Game Development
- Robotics / Artificial Intelligence
- Network and Computer Security
- .NET technology
- J2EE
- Project Management
- Most of their comments and suggestions centered on course content, instructional procedures and use of the laboratory. They felt that an in-depth coverage of theories and their practical applications is useful. They also suggested an open laboratory use.
So, based on the results, we are now looking at our curriculum and find out how we can address these suggestions.
Your thoughts?