01.Blogs :
Didith  
A blog about the stuff that keeps life interesting, meaningful, and fun.

Substance vs. form

Is there are relationship between the presentation skill and presentation content?  I wonder because some very good speakers and teachers have very shallow skill bases.  On the other hand, some people with deep knowledge and practice are the most hopeless presenters.  It's rare to find someone who can do both. 

posted on Friday, June 30, 2006 7:22 AM by Didith

# re: Substance vs. form @ Thursday, June 29, 2006 6:52 PM

I think that having the knowledge helps in two ways. It helps with confidence and it helps when questions are asked. Someone with a shallow knowledge base can give a great talk but fall apart when questions are asked. It also takes much more time to prepare the presentation. Someone with a deep knowledgebase can give a talk on short notice and little preperation.
On the other hand a deep knowledge base is not enough by itself. Presenting is very much a learned skill. Even those who appear born to it generally get better with practice and training. I have taken advantage of speaker training regularly since my high school days and I know that it helps. I like to think I am much better than I was even a few years ago. Yet I still go for training when it is available just as I work to keep the knowledge base fresh.

AlfredTwo

# re: Substance vs. form @ Thursday, June 29, 2006 10:45 PM

Based on my observation here at the center, most students who are tech skilled are most comfortable on the backstage; they don't like presenting it they just want to get things done. And so we gave our students 3 presentations for their Design Project: The Title Defense, Pre-Oral and Final Defense. This is where they can develop their confidence and good communication skill. And this could be the first step for them in becoming a good communicator. The scenario is also the same with professionals, and I agree with Sir AlfredTwo we could get better with practice and training.

mjpanes

# re: Substance vs. form @ Friday, June 30, 2006 12:54 AM

Both are necessary, but if I were to choose, I'd go for skill. There was this study I read about--some people were asked to attend a talk being given by some award-winning scientist. What they didn't know was that said person was actually just a charismatic actor who, before the talk, was briefed with several buzzwords, and during the talk, just faked everything. Most of those attending claimed to have learned from the talk. I wish I still had the link, but what I got from reading that was that if you're a good enough speaker, you can make students feel like they know something well, when in fact they don't.

cmarguel


 
03.UPDATE CALENDAR :
<June 2006>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
2345678

05.MY LINKS :

07.Subscriptions :

Subscriptions


© Copyright 2005 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Code of Conduct | Hosted by MaximumASP for Microsoft
WHO-BAR