01.Blogs :
mario  

theSpoke Refresh Document

I’m excited to post a draft of theSpoke Refresh Requirements Document I’ve been talking about for a while now. 

For the last year, we’ve been focused on two main goals for theSpoke:  building version 1.0 and localizing it into 15 languages so that it is a true global community.  We’re now very close to finishing those two goals.  We have a decent v1 feature set, all localized versions have launched, and all of them will contain an almost identical feature set by the end of January. 

We’re now at the point where we want to refresh theSpoke to move it into the future.  To do this, we’re taking the suggestions and ideas we’ve received from members of theSpoke community into account.  The document is a summary of all of the requests and ideas we’ve heard, as well as a few ideas of our own.  Let me say that it is not a promise that every single thing mentioned in it will be addressed; it’s simply a consolidation of everyone’s ideas into a (hopefully) coherent format.  It will serve as the beginning of discussions about what really matters to people in the next version.

I invite all of you to read the document and post your thoughts here.  It’s definitely long (17 pages), but we wanted to make sure everyone’s input was there.  So now we want to know what you agree with and what you disagree with.  Are there things in there that are missing?  Do you disagree with a suggestion?  All comments are welcome here in my blog, and if necessary we can start a separate message board thread about this.

By the way, a big thank you goes out to Josh Blake, or blakejr, as you may know him on theSpoke.  Josh got in touch with me before the holidays and offered to do a feature analysis of theSpoke as a member of the site.  He sent it to me back in December and it’s been awesome.  Many of his ideas are included in the document – thanks Josh!

If you have ideas and want to get in on the fun and excitement that is theSpoke refresh, please comment, or send me email at mario@thespoke.net.

posted on Thursday, January 13, 2005 9:42 PM by mario

# @ Thursday, January 13, 2005 10:13 PM

Thanks for all of your work on this document as well, Mario! I'm looking forward to seeing what everyone else has to say about the various ideas.

blakejr

# @ Friday, January 14, 2005 1:17 AM

Ok, I read it all. Phew! Really good stuff here. Kudos to all involved, especially Josh! Here are my reactions to a few key points. (1) Churn policy - this would be a nice improvement and eliminate some of the clutter, especially at the bottom of the subscribed list. (2) Browser Compatibility - #1 on my list. Look, I realize this is a Microsoft-centric site and I respect that. However, the vast majority of sites on the web support newer browsers and so should theSpoke. (3) Speed improvements - if these are made the applause will be thunderous. (4) Rating system - I read Josh's idea when he first posted them, and I hope my humorous response was taken as light-heartedly as I meant it. Personally, I think the rating system is useless and should be eliminated. (5) Member mosaic reflecting most active bloggers - I find the member mosaic useful as a way to find members I did not know existed. If it reflected the most active bloggers, the same faces would be there all the time. I think it should remain random. (6) Anonymous Comments - as a veteran of several online forums and websites that use comments, I just want to warn that in the vast majority of cases anonymous comments cause huge problems. (7) Customized MySpoke page - Great idea!!! (8) Improvements to the subscribed list - Yes! New subscribers should be easy to see. (9) More functionality to these comment boxes would be nice, like the ability to separate paragraphs. That's my 2-cents worth. Thanks for asking.

Ogman

# @ Friday, January 14, 2005 3:01 AM

The r.a.d.editor loads extrememly slow for a dial-up user. Should we have a choice to load the simple or advanced text editor before clicking on the "add new entry"?

Charisse

# @ Friday, January 14, 2005 3:58 PM

Ogman: Yeah your response to my star rating post was funny. :D Those are some good comments, although I think there is a place for anonymous comments. I will have to think about it and blog it.

blakejr

# @ Friday, January 14, 2005 6:03 PM

Ogman -- thanks for your quick, useful, and (as always) humorous feedback. Charisse -- I agree loading a simple text editor for dialup users makes sense. Personally, I'm torn on the anonymous comments. We've definitely heard advocates of both sides of that issue.

mario

# @ Friday, January 14, 2005 6:31 PM

As for anonymous comments, I'm kinda with Ogman, I think they just take away from everything. As for the other comments, I worked a lot with Josh while he was creating his analysis, so I agree with most of what he submitted. Looks good Mario, can't wait to see how I can make my blog better!

creasyja

# @ Friday, January 14, 2005 8:04 PM

How about making the anonymous comments an optional feature that can be turned on or off by the blog owner?

Ogman

# @ Friday, January 14, 2005 11:02 PM

actually, after discussing this over lunch with Josh I've been shown the light, and anonymous comments are ok with me.

creasyja

# @ Saturday, January 15, 2005 4:48 PM

I would like anonymous comments, as someone suggested having them as optional on the blog owner. If someone comes across your blog via google and wants to leave a quick comment signing up for an account would propbably put them off. I like the idea of being informed when a comment has been made to a blog, no matter how old the blog is. A daily email is the best way to go, but also a web based implementation would be nice

lukesmith

# @ Sunday, January 16, 2005 4:51 AM

I posted an argument in support of open commenting on my blog: http://www.thespoke.net/MyBlog/blakejr/MyBlog_Comments.aspx?ID=75321

blakejr

# @ Tuesday, January 18, 2005 7:26 PM

A bug I noticed for MySpace: If you upload a file with the same name as one that already exists, you would expect it to overwrite it or prompt you for what to do. Instead it makes two files with the same name, but different file ids. Very confusing.

blakejr

# @ Tuesday, January 18, 2005 7:52 PM

nice catch -- i'll add it to the document.

mario

# @ Tuesday, January 18, 2005 10:58 PM

I would like to see a way of checking back on comments you have made to other blogs you may not be subscribed to...to see if the author or others have made further comments. Secondly, is there anyway of letting us set up our own message boards or being able to edit/modify the message boards through an allocated member of Spoke?

rminnis


 
03.UPDATE CALENDAR :
<January 2005>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2627282930311
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345

05.MY LINKS :

07.Subscriptions :

Subscriptions


© Copyright 2005 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Code of Conduct | Hosted by MaximumASP for Microsoft
WHO-BAR